Supabase vs Telebase
A technical and budgetary comparison between Supabase (PostgreSQL engine) and Telebase (Telegram edge-cached engine).
| Features | Supabase | Telebase (Open Source) |
|---|---|---|
| Database Core Engine | Relational PostgreSQL. Extremely powerful relational modeling. | Dual SQL and NoSQL interfaces backed by Cloudflare KV and Telegram channels. |
| Database Pausing (Sleep) | Free tier projects pause automatically after 1 week of inactivity (causes cold starts). | Never pauses. Free hosting has 100% uptime with zero cold starts. |
| Storage Limits | 1GB free asset storage limit, followed by paid upgrade tiers. | Infinite storage using private Telegram channels. |
| Data Caching | Optional extensions or paid Redis caches. Default latency is server-dependent. | Sub-15ms reads via global Cloudflare KV cache. |
| E2E Client Encryption | Requires complex pgcrypto database extensions. | Standard AES-256-GCM zero-knowledge client encryption. |
SQL Console Included
Both platforms feature web-based SQL query tools. Telebase offers a lightweight custom dashboard tailored for quick SQL operations.
No Billing surprises
Supabase databases can incur charges if resource quotas are exceeded. Telebase uses free tier Cloudflare Pages and Telegram, ensuring true $0 pricing.
Ideal for Prototyping
Instantly connect database channels without configuring billing alerts. Focus 100% on programming and product logic.
Key Differences Summary
When to use Supabase: Supabase is the preferred choice for enterprise-level, production-grade applications that require complex SQL schema relationships, deep Postgres functionality, and foreign keys.
When to use Telebase: Telebase is perfect for student developers, side projects, MVP prototyping, and hackathons. It is specifically designed to eliminate database pausing, limit hosting costs to exactly zero, and provide free hosting for large assets.