Firebase vs Telebase

A comprehensive, factual comparison between Google Firebase and the open-source Telebase serverless engine.

FeaturesGoogle FirebaseTelebase (Open Source)
Hosting & Database CostFree tier with strict read/write count limits. Pay-as-you-go billing afterwards.100% Free. $0 hosting on Cloudflare Pages and Telegram persistence.
Storage Capacity5GB free storage limit. Expensive pricing tier for backups and media assets.Infinite free storage via Telegram. Autochunking support up to gigabytes.
Cold StartsServerless cloud functions subject to minor spin-up delays (cold starts).Zero cold starts. Run globally at the edge on Cloudflare Workers network.
Zero-Knowledge Encryption Google manages encryption keys. Client-side AES-256-GCM. Telegram can't read files.
Open Source License Proprietary / Closed vendor-lock. MIT License on GitHub. Self-host friendly.

Database Caching

Firebase caches database values on client-side memory. Telebase uses Cloudflare KV edge database, returning globally replicated reads in sub-15ms.

Private & Encrypted

Firebase requires complex IAM configuration. Telebase leverages client-side zero-knowledge architecture, meaning only you hold decryption headers.

Perfect for Hackathons

Skip credit card requirements, budget limits, and billing worries. Build complete apps at hackathons with absolute peace of mind.

Key Differences Summary

What is Telebase? An open-source serverless database layer using Telegram storage API and Cloudflare edge workers.

When to use Telebase instead of Firebase: Use Telebase if you are building hackathon projects, student assignments, staging apps, or side projects where hosting fees must be kept at exactly zero, and when you need unlimited file storage without paid quotas.

Limitations of Telebase: Telebase is not intended for high-velocity transactional financial systems or corporate production environments. It is custom-optimized for rapid prototyping and serverless hobby apps.